Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.09.27.21264219

ABSTRACT

Conjunctival and nasal mucosal antibody responses in thirty-four paediatric and forty-seven adult COVID-19 patients were measured. The mucosal antibody was IgA dominant. In the nasal epithelial lining fluid (NELF) of asymptomatic paediatric patients, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein 1 (S1) specific immunoglobulin A (IgA) was induced early. Their plasma S1-specific IgG levels were higher than symptomatic patients. More adult with mild disease had NELF S1-specific IgA than those with severe/critical illness. Within the first week of diagnosis, higher S1-specific antibodies in NELF and plasma and lower vial loads were detected in paediatric than adult patients with mild disease. The IgA and IgG levels correlated positively with the surrogate neutralization readout. The detectable NELF neutralizing S1-specific IgA in the first week after diagnosis correlated with a rapid decline in viral load. This study highlights the effect of nasal IgA in limiting the SARS-CoV-2 replication and provides complementary information to the serum antibody measurements.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Critical Illness
2.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.06.15.21256661

ABSTRACT

Vaccines that elicit mucosal immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 could potentially be of exceptional importance in providing first line defense at the site of viral entry. The serological antibody response induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have already been well characterized. In order to understand the mucosal immune response profiles of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, we examined both the mucosal and systemic responses of subjects vaccinated by two different vaccination platforms: mRNA (Comirnaty) and inactivated virus (CoronaVac). Serial nasal epithelial lining fluid (NELF) and peripheral blood samples were collected in ten subjects who had received CoronaVac and thirty-two subjects who had received Comirnaty. We quantified IgA and IgG specific to SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein by ELISA in NELF and plasma samples. The neutralization effect of these two sample types were evaluated by surrogate ACE-SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein ELISA. Only Comirnaty induced nasal SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein-specific (S1-specific) IgA and IgG responses, which were evident as early as on 14 days after the first dose. The NELF samples of 72% of subjects became IgA+IgG+, while in 62.5% of subjects the samples were neutralizing by 7 days after the second dose. In 45% of the subjects their NELF remained neutralizing 50 days after the booster of Comirnaty. In plasma, 91% and 100% Comirnaty subjects possessed S1-specific IgA+IgG+ on 14 days after the first dose and 7 days after booster, respectively. The plasma collected on 7 days after booster was 100% neutralizing. The induction of S1-specific antibody by CoronaVac was IgG dominant, and 70% of the subjects possessed S1-specific IgG by 7 days after booster and were all neutralizing. This study reveals that Comirnaty is able to induce S1-specific IgA and IgG response with neutralizing activity in the nasal mucosa in addition to a consistent systemic response. The clinical implications and the biological mechanism of an additional nasal immune response induced by vaccines such as Comirnaty warrant further investigation.

3.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.10.28.20220673

ABSTRACT

Background: Deep throat saliva (DTS) and pooled nasopharyngeal swab and throat swab (NPSTS) are utilized for viral detection. DTS is challenging for children. Swabbing the respiratory mucosa requires trained personnel and may trigger sneezing and coughing, which generate droplets. A reliable, simple and safe sampling method applicable to a wide age range is required for community-based surveillance. Methods: We introduced nasal strip as an easy and low-risk collection method. Asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (n = 38) were recruited. Nasal epithelial lining fluid (NELF) (n = 43) strip paired with nasal swab (n = 13) were collected by a healthcare worker to compare with NPSTS (n = 21) or DTS (n =22) collected within 24 hours as reference. All samples were subjected to viral RNA quantitation by real-time PCR targeting the nucleoprotein gene. Results: Comparable Ct values were observed between paired nasal strip and nasal swab samples. The agreement between nasal strip samples and NPSTS was 94.44% and 100% for NPSTS positive and negative samples. Higher viral RNA concentration was detected in nasal strips than DTS samples. False-negative results were recorded in six DTS specimens, of which four were from children. Storage at room temperature up to 72 (n = 3) hours did not affect diagnostic yield of nasal strips. Conclusions: Nasal strip is a reliable and non-invasive sampling method for SARS-CoV-2 detection, and viral detection remains stable for at least 72 hours. It can be used as an alternative tool for community-based surveillance.


Subject(s)
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
4.
researchsquare; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-24793.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: To evaluate the effectiveness of training on knowledge and practices of infection prevention and control (IPC) among pediatric health care workers (HCW) in Shanghai, China, in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: An online training program was designed by the Shanghai Pediatric Clinical Quality Control Center (SPQCC) during the early phase of COVID-19 pandemic on disease knowledge and practice of IPC. Training took place in the 81 partner hospitals affiliated with SPQCC. A 25-item self-administered questionnaire was used to evaluate knowledge gained from the training. Stratified-random sampling was used to select HCW according to three professionals (i.e., pediatricians, nurses and administrators) within each partner hospital. Awareness and knowledge of COVID-19 and its related infection control and practice was assessed by comparing survey results between different types of hospitals, professionals and professional ranks. A higher survey score meant that the respondent was more prepared and knowledgeable about COVID-19 and its infection control measures. Results: Completed questionnaires were returned from 1,062 subjects (385 pediatricians, 410 nurses, and 267 administrators), giving a response rate of 96.5%. Overall, awareness of clinical information related to COVID-19, importance of personal hygiene and isolation policy was high among the respondents. No statistical difference of scores on knowledge of COVID-19, IPC and relevant practice between the tertiary and peripheral hospitals. Among all respondents, middle-ranked health care personnel were most knowledgeable and achieved the highest score. Conclusions: Majority of pediatric HCW showed good recognition and practice in infection protection and control measures. The online training was able to achieve its aim to enhance knowledge and awareness and could have contributed to the zero infection rate among HCW caring for confirmed COVID-19 cases in Shanghai.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL